Lomas Hill School

Lomas Hill is a small, bilingual IB school across three campuses (Cuajimalpa, Santa Fe, Interlomas), running from age 2 through Year 9. The vibe most parents describe is warm and family-feeling. People genuinely like the teachers.

The strongest theme we hear is personalised attention. Small classes, kids known by name, a real focus on emotional wellbeing alongside academics. Languages are well taught (English plus French from middle school). The community is tight and parents stick around.

According to one parent, "the school is very open and with a good level of instruction" - that matches what you hear around town. Teachers in particular get a lot of warmth.

Two things worth asking about on a tour:

Staff turnover. There's reportedly been more movement among teachers and admin staff than you'd expect, and it's a question other parents have raised. Ask how many homeroom teachers are returning next year.

Special needs and learning support. The school markets inclusion, but if your child needs structured support, push hard on what the actual programme looks like in practice - staffing, specialists, individualised plans. One parent said they felt the school "is more focused on being in fashion than to really improve in areas of education." A minority view, but worth pressure-testing.

Also worth clarifying: which campus, and where the IB is fully embedded vs. still being implemented. The branding is consistent across sites; the experience can vary.

Net: a genuinely nurturing small school for a typical kid, especially in the early years. Go in with eyes open on staffing continuity and learning support, and you'll know what you're getting.

• Reviews are mixed, with strong positives on bilingual delivery and a notable controversy on past staff treatment.
• Aggregator scores sit around across roughly 40-plus reviews, lower than several Cuajimalpa peers.
• Parents praise the level of English and French and the IB PYP authorisation since 2013, with MYP candidacy following.
• Teachers are commonly described as engaged with both academic progress and student well-being, and facilities draw consistent praise.
• A 2012 Change.org petition documents the dismissal of a school psychologist after she screened the film Milk to secondary students. Signatories said she was held by security for nearly two hours and humiliated in front of staff and parents; CONAPRED, the federal anti-discrimination agency, attempted mediation and the school declined to engage. The case sits in the public record and shapes some of the older critical commentary.
• Independent critical reviews from current parents are otherwise light. Most negative comment online concerns this historical episode rather than a sustained pattern of present-day complaints.